We are two part-time academics. Ellen teaches in the English department and Jim in the IT program at George Mason University.
Dear Marianne,
My report on Chicago will paradoxically be about how little I felt one could learn about it unless one stayed there for weeks and weeks. I had not realized what a big place it is. It’s not as overwhelmingly large as NYC sometimes seems or endless like London, but it’s way bigger than Paris (if you exclude the suburbs) and little Washington, D.C.
Like these last two, there also seems to be “no there there” (a phrase of Gertrude Stein’s). There is no central one place or places where much of this or that sort of culture conglomerates; everything is spread out and scattered. To be sure, the many different scattered skyscrapers are in the center of the city, and tour guides (especially I suppose the architectural tour type which we took) can yak away (with a mild boosterism) about all the different high buildings and their history, but theatres, parks, arenas are spread out to the north and south side. The north side does seem to have the much richer quarters; the south side (where we went to see the University of Chicago—a very old Oxford looking school) includes a vast impoverished mostly black area (where Richard Wright set Native Son). It’s all continuous: one vast plain by a confluence of two rivers and one lake, a flat prairie on which groups of people erected railways and whose location made it an industrial exchange center.
In the section in Trollope’s North America where he visits and describes Chicago, what he goes to is a vast granary where he watches huge amounts of wheat travelling up and down a grand contraption. He also describes canals and trains and hotels and lots of travelling people he sees. Apparently in the last 30 years or so much of old Chicago built after Trollope’s visit was torn down (as slums). In the center of the renovated Chicago we walked through a new park: it has a Wolf Trap like theatre and extends away from the Art Institute along the lake and river into the Navy Pier where there’s a large amusement park.
Edward was impressed by how it seemed “mid-western,” different in outlook or culture from the East. There seemed to be no elite ideal of the patrician Anglo sort one finds in both NYC and DC (say in Lincoln and Kennedy Centers). A business class ran and runs the place. It might be thought that therefore nothing offsets money as a thing to respect. While it was comfortable, I didn’t like the reciprocal club (hotel really) we stayed at: it was anonymous, cold, very glamorous I suppose, but the deference in the dining room embarrassed me, and there was not one pamphlet or brochure in the room to help us discover what was where.
However, there is a counterweight ideal, and it is progressive: a long history of labor politics (it was here the Haymarket riots took place, here the earliest unions were set up) and a large African-American culture. The books I remember best about Chicago are Upton Sinclair’s Jungle, Theodore Dreiser’s Sister Carrie and Jane Addams’s autobiography of herself and Hull House. (I’ve only read one novel by Saul Bellow and don’t remember it very well, and don’t care for Sandberg.) In the 1890s too there was a rich Renaissance (so-called) of poetry and magazines, a kind of heyday from which people like Harriet Monroe made circles of people get together. The book I read in Vermont about American houses had a long section on housing in Chicago as centrally indicative of American private dwellings. The subway did remind me of the NYC subway, the loop is like the L in the Bronx; many city streets and avenues, of streets and avenues in Manhattan. The city itself had institutions (one a recently-built lovely-looking library near us) dedicated to black history.
We did do our usual sorts of things. We went to the theatre twice: Edward thought the production of Sondheim’s Passion we saw excellent. I’m moved by the music: “Love is not a choice/Love is what I am,” and the touching, “So much happiness …” We also saw the film, The Jane Austen Book Club, which I liked more than I thought I would. (I’ll write about it separately but only briefly until I’ve read Fowler’s novel and seen the movie once again.) I found myself laughing at the good-natured self-reflexive jokes about the Jane Austen addiction; Edward laughed too (and he hasn’t read any of Jane Austen’s books through). The Art Institute has a fine permanent collection of paintings and the building is lovely and set in a beautiful garden. I’m not much on amusement parks but the walk along Lake Michigan (if it had not been so hot) was picturesque with boats of all kinds everywhere. We ate two exquisitely delicious meals, one in a restaurant near the University of Chicago, La Petite Follie (I never tasted such yummy champagne in my life), and another in a restaurant where the customers seemed to be 5 males for every female, No 10, Trattoria, this in the center of town.
Probably the most interesting thing we did, something we could have done nowhere else was our visit to Robie House, a private dwelling Frank Lloyd Wright built next to the area where the University of Chicago is. This is said to be built in the “prairie house” ideal mode of Wright. It’s a stark departure from late Victorian and Edwardian houses, and anticipates the building Falling Water (which we saw when we went to an 18th century conference in Pennsylvania). What struck me were features in it which are very like those in our small house here in Alexandria. Our house is a group of simple shapes too: two large near squares on top of which are two triangles. We too have a front door that is to the side of the house and hard to find; our fireplace is in the center of the front part of the house and the rooms around it form an open circle you can walk around. The bedrooms have low closets, supposedly good for children’s toys (actually they break easily and it’s hard to find toys in them). In other words, our “mid-century modern” house (now in shabby shape) was influenced by Wright’s prairie house in Chicago (as were many others of the 1940s, 50s era).
It was unusually hot. (People tell me here in Alexandria tell me it was just “ghastly” hot.) The city was having a marathon run of 26 miles and about 3 hours into the race, a halt was called: all those who had not run half-way by that time were made to stop. It was dangerous: a couple of hundred people were hospitalized, and one man died. The wind helped: there was a wind which came up the streets in the later afternoon. (It is a city on a flat plain.)
What more is there to say? We took Southwest Air which runs planes as if they were buses: everyone in steerage and you have to find your own seat and pronto. I did get into conversation with people waiting in the (awful) airline building because the plane was delayed. They were a group who knew Alexandria 20 years ago and so it was interesting to talk with them. We will take this airline again as we are planning to return for 3 days in late December when the MLA will be meeting in Chicago. Then we’ll see more. Edward says we probably won’t be able to go to the Opera house or listen to symphonies as during the Christmas season a lot of these places shut down. Doubtless we’ll find something to do in the evening anyway :).
And I was as intensely glad to be home as I usually am.
Elinor
--
Posted by: Ellen
* * *
commenting closed for this article